1. WRRC Conference 2019 – Arizona Runs On Water: Scarcity, Challenges, and Community-based Solutions. Leslie Meyers, Area Manager for the Phoenix Area Office of the U.S. Department of Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), will offer the keynote presentation at the WRRC’s upcoming conference Arizona Runs on Water: Scarcity, Challenges, and Community-based Solutions. Ms. Meyers is very active in the oversight of Reclamation’s projects in Arizona and in statewide water resource issues with a wide range of constituents ranging from Native American tribes to agricultural and municipal water users. Her presentation will highlight the Lower Basin and Intra-Arizona Drought Contingency Plan (DCP) as well as other Arizona BOR programs and priorities.
This is an exciting time to hear her thoughts and perspectives because it will be only one day after the deadline set by Commissioner Brenda Burman for the states to complete their work on the DCP. The WRRC conference will be held at the Black Canyon Conference Center, 9440 N 25th Ave. Don’t miss the opportunity for online registration, which lasts until 5:00 p.m. on Friday, January 25th. The price to attend will increase by $10 for onsite registration.
2.
BIOSOLIDS SEMINAR
January 29, 2019
From 7:30 AM – 3:30 PM
SRP Pera Club, Tempe, AZ
INFORMATION AND TO REGISTER
Come join us for a one-day seminar offering 6 PDHs – on cutting edge topics for residuals and biosolids management; addressing the need for renewable resources and their impacts now and in the future.
Topics
- Digestion Overview
- ATAD
- Dewatering & Drying
- Thermal Hydrolysis
- Resource Recovery
- 91st Ave Biogas Project-Case Study
- Pima County Implementation- Case Study
- ASU Research Project
- Q&A
Contact: Nathan Antonneau, nantonneau@walshgroup.com, (414) 418-9994
3. Do You Know: What do you study if you study “Hoplology”
A. Hop-A-Long Cassidy B. Frogs C. Wines D. Weapons
ANSWER AT BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE
4. Glyphosate Safety Issue Under Discussion. Independent studies link glyphosate to cancer, yet the Environmental Protection Agency STILL maintains that glyphosate is safe. Now we know why.
A new report exposes how the EPA ignored independent studies linking glyphosate to cancer in humans, instead choosing to rely on studies funded by Monsanto to support its position that glyphosate is not carcinogenic.
This is INSANE. The EPA relied on Monsanto’s own studies to determine whether glyphosate is safe. That’s like letting the fox guard the henhouse.
In contrast, the World Health Organization classified glyphosate as probably carcinogenic to humans in 2015 based on peer-reviewed studies – i.e., studies reviewed by EXPERTS. California followed suit, in 2017, adding glyphosate to the state’s list of chemicals known to cause cancer.
Monsanto has been trying to cover up glyphosate’s carcinogenic risks for years, even going so far as to attack EWG by calling our research “propaganda.” We’re not going to stop exposing their dirty tactics, but we need your help. Please take EWG’s quick survey on glyphosate to help us fight back against Monsanto.
Grand Canyon National Park
5. Behind the Garbage, Shutdown Takes Invisible Toll on Arizona’s Environment ELIZABETH WHITMAN | JANUARY 14, 2019 | 6:30AM PHOENIX NEW TIMES. Some of Roger Clark’s earliest childhood memories are of ranger talks at Grand Canyon, where he learned about ring-tailed cats and the history of the ancient gorge. “All that made a difference in who I became, as a biologist, as an educator, and as an advocate,” said Clark, who went on to study forestry and natural resource management. Today, he is the Grand Canyon program director at Grand Canyon Trust, a nonprofit that aims to protect the environment of the Colorado Plateau.
These kinds of programs, which Clark found so formative, have been unavailable for the last three weeks. The federal government has been partially shut down since December 22 over President Donald Trump’s demands for funding from Congress to build a new wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.
Other federal projects and operations at Arizona’s national parks and monuments are also on hold, such as the U.S. Geological Survey’s monitoring the Colorado River for uranium contamination.
Environmentalists like Clark worry that, with this work suspended, the shutdown will have lasting repercussions for Arizona’s environment and the people charged with protecting it, exacerbating a long-running lack of funding for these efforts. Meanwhile, state and local agencies say that so far, they have mostly been unaffected by the lapse in federal funding.
The impact from losing federal programs, even temporarily, is not visible the way piles of trash or overflowing toilets are, both of which have been documented at Yosemite National Park, Joshua Tree National Park, and elsewhere since the shutdown began. In Arizona, Chiricahua National Monument was initially kept open, until the Park Service closed it January 3 because there were no maintenance services for bathrooms or trash.
Nor do the programs seem as urgent as the needs of hundreds of thousands of furloughed federal employees not receiving paychecks. In Arizona, about 7,300 federal employees are furloughed or working without pay, according to data compiled by the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank. Of those, 4,000 are with the Department of Interior, which houses the National Park Service.
Other consequences, environmentalists fear, are more subtle than that. Questions about the status of specific programs sent to the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Park Service, and the U.S. Geological Survey either received auto-replies saying the contacted employee had been furloughed, or were not responded to by deadline.
“Important science and planning for projects is at a complete standstill,” said Kevin Dahl, Arizona’s senior program manager for the nonprofit National Parks Conservation Association.
One of these projects is replacing the 16-mile Trans-Canyon Pipeline that brings water to the Grand Canyon’s South Rim. It dates back to the 1960s, and it regularly suffers from leaks and breaks.
“We desperately need a new pipeline,” Dahl said.
Grand Canyon National Park
The National Park Service has been working through the environmental planning necessary to build a new pipeline. It was taking comments from the public through November 10. Where the project stands now is not clear, because updated information from the National Park Service was not available due to the shutdown.
Dahl said that the Park Service had been saving up Grand Canyon entrance fees — $35 — to help cover the costs. But right now, because there’s no one collecting those fees, the park is losing out, delaying a new Trans-Canyon Pipeline further.
Even before the shutdown, the maintenance backlog for the Grand Canyon’s roads and buildings stood at $330 million. Overall, infrastructure at Arizona’s national parks need $531 million worth of work.
“In order to preserve the economic value of the visitor economy, they’re trying to keep the parks open with bare minimum staffing,” said Elgie Holstein, the senior director for strategic planning for the nonprofit Environmental Defense Fund. “But they’re not doing any of the work that gets done day-to-day to maintain the parks and keep them clean and safe and sanitary.”
Monitoring for contamination from uranium mining around the Grand Canyon is also on hold, said Clark of the Grand Canyon Trust. The U.S. Geological Survey is responsible for that, but under the shutdown, its employees are furloughed. They’re no longer monitoring surface waters at sites on the Colorado River, which supplies 40 million people with drinking water, for uranium and associated trace elements.
including Grand Canyon, and certain wilderness areas.
The Clean Air Act set the goal of having pristine, clear air over many of these spaces by the year 2040. This means that the EPA or the state, overseen by the EPA, is supposed to monitor plants like the coal-burning Navajo Generating Station to make sure they have the technology to pollute as little as possible.
“That’s an ongoing process, and if the government is shut down, of course, that stops,” said Dahl.
None of this includes the potential toll on these agencies’ future labor force. looking for new jobs. “They’re individuals with families,” Dahl pointed out.
“There’s an aggregate of invisible impacts that are immense,” he added. “This is crazy and damaging in so many ways.”
State and local agencies tasked with protecting Arizona’s air, water, and soil say that they have been minimally affected by the shutdown, if at all — so far.
For the most part, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality can access federal grant money that was awarded through the end of March and potentially beyond, said Erin Jordan, spokesperson for the department. That money helps fund a slew of programs covering environmental issues including air quality, groundwater, and drinking water. Cleanup at Brownfield and Superfund sites continues unaffected, Jordan said.
Answer To Question For No. 3 : D. Weapons
Copyright EnviroInsight 2019
